DEI Backlash & Minority Brands
If you’ve been following DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) practices in the United States over the past few years, you may feel a bit of whiplash. In 2020, the civil rights landscape transformed in response to the Black Lives Matter movement, prompting schools, government organizations, and corporations to pledge dedicated time and money toward DEI initiatives. That year, Target committed $10 million to social justice initiatives and set a goal to increase its Black workforce by 20% over three years.
As time passed, the political conversation surrounding DEI changed. Conservative activists linked DEI initiatives to the term “woke” and began pressuring corporations to scale back their commitments to diversity and inclusion. In 2023, SCOTUS ruled against affirmative action in college admissions, and just weeks ago, the newly elected U.S. President declared that policies designed to increase minority representation—by considering factors such as race, gender, and sexual orientation—are unconstitutional. This political shift has had a direct impact on corporate DEI strategies.
In response, major brands like Target, Walmart, McDonald’s, and Ford have reduced or completely phased out their DEI commitments. While this may shield them from conservative backlash, these decisions severely impact minority employees, suppliers, and brand collaborators. Many retailers had launched initiatives aimed at increasing supplier diversity—giving minority-owned brands opportunities to sell in major stores. Now, as these programs disappear, it becomes increasingly difficult for Black- and minority-owned brands to gain or maintain shelf space in large retail chains.
Beyond corporate decisions, consumer behavior also plays a crucial role in the survival of these brands. Tabitha Brown, an actress, entrepreneur, and social media influencer, has collaborated with Target and Walmart on various product lines, from home goods to plant-based foods. She recently spoke out, warning that boycotting retailers like Target could have unintended consequences:
"...But the thing that concerns me the most, and I want you to hear me and hear me well. If we all decide to stop supporting said businesses (with the DEI bans) and say, you know, I can’t buy nothing from there, even the businesses who were affected by the DEI ban, right? What that does is, you take all our sales, and they dwindle down and then those companies get to say, oh, your products are not performing, and they can remove them from the shelves and then put their preferred businesses on the shelves..." she explained.
In other words, reduced sales data can be used to justify cutting partnerships with diverse brands, leaving fewer spaces for Black-owned and minority businesses to thrive.
It remains uncertain whether these corporate DEI reversals are permanent, but history suggests that companies adjust their commitments based on political and social climates. As consumers, we hold power. By staying informed and making purchases with brands that align with our values, we help shape the future of retail inclusivity.
Help inform one another by sharing your thoughts and feelings in the comment section. Do you agree with these corporate shifts? How will this affect where you spend your money? How will you continue to stay informed on policy changes in this political climate? Let us know below.
Stay tuned for more exciting updates from Ayana Active as we continue to redefine the boundaries of fashion, sustainability, and empowerment. Follow us on Instagram @ayanaactive.